Compare the hardboiled, dogmatic, polarizing label sometimes applied to the self-identified sceptic of today – climate sceptic, vaccine sceptic, evolution sceptic, election sceptic – to the philosophical model created by Cicero some 2000 years ago.
Remove the toga, translate the latin, and we have a model of scepticism less pejorative than inspirational i.e. “The genuine sceptic is not the person who doubts everything, nor the person who demands proof before anything. It is the person who has learned to hold their best views with the right strength of grip: firmly enough to act on them, loosely enough to let go when the evidence turns.” Click: He Was probably Right.
That sounds like the provisional methodology of scientific inquiry in which hypotheses are iterated in response to new information or unexpected results. Now apply the same mindset to the political arena and doubt may be seen as less the enemy of conviction than a pause that prevents conviction from becoming a captive of rhetoric…
Read More